The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Lotz v. Commonwealth
No. 081122Supreme Court of Virginia
081122 Lotz v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 In a periodic review proceeding held pursuant to Code § 37.2-910, concerning continuation of secure inpatient treatment under the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Pre…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
081122 Lotz v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 In a periodic review proceeding held pursuant to Code § 37.2-910, concerning continuation …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 27, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
081122 Lotz v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 In a periodic review proceeding held pursuant to Code § 37.2-910, concerning continuation of secure inpatient treatment under the Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act, there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court's determination that the respondent continued to be a sexually violent predator, and to support an order that he remain in secure inpatient treatment as opposed to being placed on a conditional release status. The Commonwealth's report prepared pursuant to Code § 37.2-910 was admitted into evidence, and fell within the definition of judicial records, creating a rebuttable presumption of public access. Because no evide…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links