The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Mwangi v. Commonwealth
081065 Mwangi v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 In a prosecution on charges of driving under the influence in violation of Code § 18.2-266, third offense, leading to a sentence under Code § 18.2-270(C)(1), the Court …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
081065 Mwangi v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 In a prosecution on charges of driving under the influence in violation of Code § 18.2-2…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 27, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
081065 Mwangi v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 In a prosecution on charges of driving under the influence in violation of Code § 18.2-266, third offense, leading to a sentence under Code § 18.2-270(C)(1), the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the conviction where the Commonwealth's proof of recidivism at trial relied on a purported order from a general district court which was never endorsed by a judge, which did not prove the prior conviction that is an element of the felony offense. The judgment is reversed, the trial court conviction is vacated, and the case is remanded for a new trial on the lesser-included misdemeanor charge if the Commonwealth be so advised.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
ReversedVacatedAffirmedRemanded
The court's record, as written
081065 Mwangi v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 In a prosecution on charges of driving under the influence in violation of Code § 18.2-266, third offense, leading to a sentence under Code § 18.2-270(C)(1), the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the conviction where the Commonwealth's proof of recidivism at trial relied on a purported order from a general district court which was never endorsed by a judge, which did not prove the prior conviction that is an element of the felony offense. The judgment is reversed, the trial court conviction is vacated, and the case is remanded for a new trial on the lesser-included misdemeanor charge if the Commonwealth be so advised.
Outcome words in this text: affirming, reversed, vacated, remanded.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
