The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Frederick County Business Park v. Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality
081175 Frederick County Business Park v. Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality 06/04/2009 In an appeal from a Court of Appeals' judgment sustaining the decision of the Virginia Department of Environmental Qu…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
081175 Frederick County Business Park v. Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality 06/04/2009 In an appeal from a Court of Appeals'…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 4, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
081175 Frederick County Business Park v. Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality 06/04/2009 In an appeal from a Court of Appeals' judgment sustaining the decision of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, it cannot be said that the Department's decision that a facility proposed by a limited liability business park entity was a materials recovery facility subject to the permitting requirements of the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations, 9 VAC § 20-80-10, et seq., was arbitrary or capricious. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
081175 Frederick County Business Park v. Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality 06/04/2009 In an appeal from a Court of Appeals' judgment sustaining the decision of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, it cannot be said that the Department's decision that a facility proposed by a limited liability business park entity was a materials recovery facility subject to the permitting requirements of the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulations, 9 VAC § 20-80-10, et seq., was arbitrary or capricious. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Outcome words in this text: affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
