Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
District court · CAND

The State of California et al v. United States Department of Interior et al

No. 3:25-cv-03850California Northern District

[Order on Motion for Summary Judgment]

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

[Order on Motion for Summary Judgment]

At a glance
Court
California Northern District
First added here
August 14, 2026
Last entry
September 1, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

[Order on Motion for Summary Judgment]

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

2 entries, oldest first.

  1. · California Northern District

    GrantedDenied

    The court's record, as written

    ORDER GRANTING 19 MOTION TO INTERVENE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF MOVING TO DISMISS AND DENYING RULE 12(b)(7) MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO JOIN AN INDISPENSABLE PARTY. Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on 8/26/2025. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2025)

    Outcome words in this text: GRANTING, DENYING.

  2. · California Northern District

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    [Order on Motion for Summary Judgment]

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket