The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Jones, Russell v. Commonwealth
No. 090979Supreme Court of Virginia
090979 Jones, Russell v. Commonwealth 02/25/2010 In review of a suppression ruling turning on whether off-duty law enforcement officers, privately employed by an apartment complex to protect against trespasser…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
090979 Jones, Russell v. Commonwealth 02/25/2010 In review of a suppression ruling turning on whether off-duty law enforcement of…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- February 25, 2010
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
090979 Jones, Russell v. Commonwealth 02/25/2010 In review of a suppression ruling turning on whether off-duty law enforcement officers, privately employed by an apartment complex to protect against trespassers, unlawfully seized a defendant in violation of the Fourth Amendment when they requested that he accompany them to the rental office to issue a notice barring him from the property, the defendant has not carried his burden of showing that the circuit court's findings of fact -- that he consented to go to a rental office for a brief time, without force or coercion -- were plainly wrong or unsupported by the evidence, or that the circuit court committed reversible error. No error in the…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links