The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Midkiff v. Commonwealth
091793 Midkiff v. Commonwealth 06/10/2010 In a prosecution under Code § 18.2-374.1:1 for possession of child pornography, because digital video recordings and still images admitted at trial were reproduced by …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
091793 Midkiff v. Commonwealth 06/10/2010 In a prosecution under Code § 18.2-374.1:1 for possession of child pornography, because…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 10, 2010
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
091793 Midkiff v. Commonwealth 06/10/2010 In a prosecution under Code § 18.2-374.1:1 for possession of child pornography, because digital video recordings and still images admitted at trial were reproduced by making a bit for bit copy of the hard drives on defendant's computer, writing files from that copy to a digital video disc and then printing them without changes, the printed pictures and video recordings were reliable representations of the material contained in the files in the defendant's computer hard drives and the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in receiving the pictures and video recordings into evidence. The judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding defendant's conv…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
