The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Covel v. Town of Vienna
091343 Covel v. Town of Vienna 06/10/2010 The judgment is affirmed in three consolidated circuit court actions involving challenges to a local historic preservation ordinance and decisions made by the locality…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
091343 Covel v. Town of Vienna 06/10/2010 The judgment is affirmed in three consolidated circuit court actions involving challeng…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 10, 2010
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
091343 Covel v. Town of Vienna 06/10/2010 The judgment is affirmed in three consolidated circuit court actions involving challenges to a local historic preservation ordinance and decisions made by the locality thereunder. No evidence in the record rebuts the presumption of validity of the locality's decision denying a certificate of appropriateness to build a fence and denying permission to remove various parcels from the historic district. Code § 15.2-1427(C), reenacted in 2000, bars all non-constitutional challenges to the adoption of ordinances existing at that time, such as the ordinance involved in these cases. The ordinance provisions at issue here are sufficiently precise and definit…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedDenied
The court's record, as written
091343 Covel v. Town of Vienna 06/10/2010 The judgment is affirmed in three consolidated circuit court actions involving challenges to a local historic preservation ordinance and decisions made by the locality thereunder. No evidence in the record rebuts the presumption of validity of the locality's decision denying a certificate of appropriateness to build a fence and denying permission to remove various parcels from the historic district. Code § 15.2-1427(C), reenacted in 2000, bars all non-constitutional challenges to the adoption of ordinances existing at that time, such as the ordinance involved in these cases. The ordinance provisions at issue here are sufficiently precise and definit…
Outcome words in this text: affirmed, denying.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
