The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Jenkins v. Mehra
092272 Jenkins v. Mehra 01/13/2011 In an appeal challenging a trial court's judgment refusing to hold a party in contempt after having found that the party failed to abide by the terms of a prior order of the …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
092272 Jenkins v. Mehra 01/13/2011 In an appeal challenging a trial court's judgment refusing to hold a party in contempt after h…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- January 13, 2011
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
092272 Jenkins v. Mehra 01/13/2011 In an appeal challenging a trial court's judgment refusing to hold a party in contempt after having found that the party failed to abide by the terms of a prior order of the court awarding injunctive relief, the appeal is dismissed because this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the refusal to find civil contempt.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Dismissed
The court's record, as written
092272 Jenkins v. Mehra 01/13/2011 In an appeal challenging a trial court's judgment refusing to hold a party in contempt after having found that the party failed to abide by the terms of a prior order of the court awarding injunctive relief, the appeal is dismissed because this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the refusal to find civil contempt.
Outcome words in this text: dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
