The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Davis v. MKR Development, LLC
171020 Davis v. MKR Development, LLC 05/31/2018 In a derivative action brought on behalf of a limited liability company by the majority shareholder against the entity appointed under the LLC's operating agreem…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
171020 Davis v. MKR Development, LLC 05/31/2018 In a derivative action brought on behalf of a limited liability company by the ma…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- May 31, 2018
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
171020 Davis v. MKR Development, LLC 05/31/2018 In a derivative action brought on behalf of a limited liability company by the majority shareholder against the entity appointed under the LLC's operating agreement to manage the company, along with two of the manager's principals, the circuit court erred in dismissing the action on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to first make a demand for the corporation to take action. Although Code § 13.1-1042, as amended, no longer expressly states a "futility exception" to the demand requirement, the revised statute did not abolish the futility exception, which has long been part of the law and is contemplated in other provisions of Virginia sta…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Dismissed
The court's record, as written
171020 Davis v. MKR Development, LLC 05/31/2018 In a derivative action brought on behalf of a limited liability company by the majority shareholder against the entity appointed under the LLC's operating agreement to manage the company, along with two of the manager's principals, the circuit court erred in dismissing the action on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to first make a demand for the corporation to take action. Although Code § 13.1-1042, as amended, no longer expressly states a "futility exception" to the demand requirement, the revised statute did not abolish the futility exception, which has long been part of the law and is contemplated in other provisions of Virginia sta…
Outcome words in this text: dismissing.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
