The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Lisann v. Lisann
230718 Lisann v. Lisann 05/08/2025 The Court of Appeals disposition in this case, that a divorce may be granted pursuant to Code § 20-91(A)(9) without either party demonstrating an intent to permanently live s…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
230718 Lisann v. Lisann 05/08/2025 The Court of Appeals disposition in this case, that a divorce may be granted pursuant to Code …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- May 8, 2025
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
230718 Lisann v. Lisann 05/08/2025 The Court of Appeals disposition in this case, that a divorce may be granted pursuant to Code § 20-91(A)(9) without either party demonstrating an intent to permanently live separate and apart throughout the statutory period of separation -- and that the intent to permanently separate need only exist at the very beginning of the separation period -- is rejected. The intent to permanently separate must predominate throughout the statutory period. Such intent can be factually inferred, but it cannot be deemed legally irrelevant. Though the reasoning of the Court of Appeals is rejected in this case, the trial court's judgment is affirmed, because the record su…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
AffirmedGranted
The court's record, as written
230718 Lisann v. Lisann 05/08/2025 The Court of Appeals disposition in this case, that a divorce may be granted pursuant to Code § 20-91(A)(9) without either party demonstrating an intent to permanently live separate and apart throughout the statutory period of separation -- and that the intent to permanently separate need only exist at the very beginning of the separation period -- is rejected. The intent to permanently separate must predominate throughout the statutory period. Such intent can be factually inferred, but it cannot be deemed legally irrelevant. Though the reasoning of the Court of Appeals is rejected in this case, the trial court's judgment is affirmed, because the record su…
Outcome words in this text: granted, affirmed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
