The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Under Wild Skies v. NRA
240683 Under Wild Skies v. NRA 05/29/2025 In an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial courts' refusal to give the plaintiff's proffered jury instruction on the doctrine of adequa…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
240683 Under Wild Skies v. NRA 05/29/2025 In an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial courts' refu…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- May 29, 2025
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
240683 Under Wild Skies v. NRA 05/29/2025 In an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial courts' refusal to give the plaintiff's proffered jury instruction on the doctrine of adequate assurance in a case involving claims of breach of contract and anticipatory breach, the trial court did not commit reversible error by refusing the instruction. The proffered instruction, based on Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 251, expands the definition of repudiation beyond what is currently recognized in Virginia law, and was thus not an accurate statement of Virginia law regarding repudiation. As the Court of Appeals correctly recognized, that the doctrine of anticipatory…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
240683 Under Wild Skies v. NRA 05/29/2025 In an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial courts' refusal to give the plaintiff's proffered jury instruction on the doctrine of adequate assurance in a case involving claims of breach of contract and anticipatory breach, the trial court did not commit reversible error by refusing the instruction. The proffered instruction, based on Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 251, expands the definition of repudiation beyond what is currently recognized in Virginia law, and was thus not an accurate statement of Virginia law regarding repudiation. As the Court of Appeals correctly recognized, that the doctrine of anticipatory…
Outcome words in this text: affirming.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
