The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commonwealth v. Kartozia
No. 240294Supreme Court of Virginia
240294 Commonwealth v. Kartozia 06/05/2025 In an appeal considering whether the circuit court erred in denying a jury instruction, proposed by the defendant, regarding a good-faith claim-of-right defense to a …
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
240294 Commonwealth v. Kartozia 06/05/2025 In an appeal considering whether the circuit court erred in denying a jury instruction…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 5, 2025
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
240294 Commonwealth v. Kartozia 06/05/2025 In an appeal considering whether the circuit court erred in denying a jury instruction, proposed by the defendant, regarding a good-faith claim-of-right defense to a trespassing charge, there is no evidence that the defendant harbored a good-faith belief that he was entitled to remain on the condominium property where he was arrested and -- even if his belief in a claim of right was sincere -- the objective facts upon which he purportedly relied, did not rise to the level of being an authorization for him to remain on the property. Thus, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by determining that defendant's proposed instruction was not supp…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links