The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Cothran v. Jauregui
250019 Cothran v. Jauregui 12/30/2025 In a medical malpractice claim, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's ruling sustaining the defendant physician's plea in bar asserting that the statut…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
250019 Cothran v. Jauregui 12/30/2025 In a medical malpractice claim, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's r…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- December 30, 2025
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
250019 Cothran v. Jauregui 12/30/2025 In a medical malpractice claim, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's ruling sustaining the defendant physician's plea in bar asserting that the statute of limitations barred the claim. Although there was a possibility that plaintiff might return to see the physician at some unknown point in the future, a substantial interruption occurred in the course of plaintiff's examination and treatment concerning a lump that plaintiff had found in her breast. She and the physician proceeded after an October 2018 appointment as though the physician-patient relationship had ended, and the longer that interruption continued, the more substantial…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
250019 Cothran v. Jauregui 12/30/2025 In a medical malpractice claim, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the trial court's ruling sustaining the defendant physician's plea in bar asserting that the statute of limitations barred the claim. Although there was a possibility that plaintiff might return to see the physician at some unknown point in the future, a substantial interruption occurred in the course of plaintiff's examination and treatment concerning a lump that plaintiff had found in her breast. She and the physician proceeded after an October 2018 appointment as though the physician-patient relationship had ended, and the longer that interruption continued, the more substantial…
Outcome words in this text: reversing.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
