Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Blow v. Commonwealth

No. 250365Supreme Court of Virginia

250365 Blow v. Commonwealth 04/16/2026 After an undercover law-enforcement officer performed a controlled drug transaction with the defendant at a clothing store, officers obtained a warrant for his arrest and…

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

250365 Blow v. Commonwealth 04/16/2026 After an undercover law-enforcement officer performed a controlled drug transaction with t…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First added here
October 4, 2026
Last entry
April 16, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

250365 Blow v. Commonwealth 04/16/2026 After an undercover law-enforcement officer performed a controlled drug transaction with the defendant at a clothing store, officers obtained a warrant for his arrest and a search warrant for the store. Upon executing the warrant, officers discovered more marijuana and firearms inside the store. On appeal, the defendant contends that the evidence obtained from the search should have been suppressed because the officers violated Code § 19.2-56(B) by not giving him a copy of the search warrant and its supporting affidavit; the Court of Appeals disagreed. Because "the search warrant" in the first paragraph of the statute refers to a search warrant for a "…

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket