The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Commonwealth v. Mahoney
250487 Commonwealth v. Mahoney 06/11/2026 A jury found appellant guilty of second-degree murder, maliciously shooting at an occupied vehicle, and use of a firearm in the commission of murder. This defendant, w…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
250487 Commonwealth v. Mahoney 06/11/2026 A jury found appellant guilty of second-degree murder, maliciously shooting at an occup…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- June 11, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
250487 Commonwealth v. Mahoney 06/11/2026 A jury found appellant guilty of second-degree murder, maliciously shooting at an occupied vehicle, and use of a firearm in the commission of murder. This defendant, who the Commonwealth concedes did not shoot the decedent, was charged as a principal in the second degree; the shooter was never identified. Before the Court of Appeals, this defendant argued that the Commonwealth's evidence was insufficient to prove that he shared the shooter's criminal intent. The Court of Appeals agreed and vacated his convictions. Because it misapplied the standard of review and developed its own hypothesis of innocence, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is rever…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Vacated
The court's record, as written
250487 Commonwealth v. Mahoney 06/11/2026 A jury found appellant guilty of second-degree murder, maliciously shooting at an occupied vehicle, and use of a firearm in the commission of murder. This defendant, who the Commonwealth concedes did not shoot the decedent, was charged as a principal in the second degree; the shooter was never identified. Before the Court of Appeals, this defendant argued that the Commonwealth's evidence was insufficient to prove that he shared the shooter's criminal intent. The Court of Appeals agreed and vacated his convictions. Because it misapplied the standard of review and developed its own hypothesis of innocence, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is rever…
Outcome words in this text: vacated.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
