The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Pinnacle Flooring Solutions v. Premier Homes Group
No. 250618Supreme Court of Virginia
250618 Pinnacle Flooring Solutions v. Premier Homes Group 07/30/2026 After winning at trial on its counterclaim, a home construction company sought to recover its attorney fees from the subcontractor who under…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.The activity
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The source
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
250618 Pinnacle Flooring Solutions v. Premier Homes Group 07/30/2026 After winning at trial on its counterclaim, a home construct…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- July 30, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
250618 Pinnacle Flooring Solutions v. Premier Homes Group 07/30/2026 After winning at trial on its counterclaim, a home construction company sought to recover its attorney fees from the subcontractor who undertook to provide materials and install flooring in three homes. The trial court denied the request for attorney fees, finding that the builder had not sufficiently identified the basis for its request in its counterclaim as required by Rule 3:25(b) of the Rules of this Court. The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment concluding that, while the builder's counterclaim did not explicitly state the basis for its request, the flooring subcontractor was appropriately on notice of the basis…
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of Virginia
Reversed
The court's record, as written
250618 Pinnacle Flooring Solutions v. Premier Homes Group 07/30/2026 After winning at trial on its counterclaim, a home construction company sought to recover its attorney fees from the subcontractor who undertook to provide materials and install flooring in three homes. The trial court denied the request for attorney fees, finding that the builder had not sufficiently identified the basis for its request in its counterclaim as required by Rule 3:25(b) of the Rules of this Court. The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment concluding that, while the builder's counterclaim did not explicitly state the basis for its request, the flooring subcontractor was appropriately on notice of the basis…
Outcome words in this text: reversed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links