The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Johnson v. Stuff
Johnson v. Stuff 2026-0054Habeas corpus—Inmate’s underlying theories of relief are not cognizable in habeas corpus, because he has raised only nonjurisdictional issues for which he had an adequate remedy in or…
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Johnson v. Stuff 2026-0054Habeas corpus—Inmate’s underlying theories of relief are not cognizable in habeas corpus, because he ha…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Ohio
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- September 2, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Johnson v. Stuff 2026-0054Habeas corpus—Inmate’s underlying theories of relief are not cognizable in habeas corpus, because he has raised only nonjurisdictional issues for which he had an adequate remedy in ordinary course of law by way of direct appeal—Court of appeals’ judgment granting warden’s motion to dismiss affirmed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-3379 9/2/2026 9/2/2026 2026-Ohio-3379
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
This court's public feed does not carry later entries in a case, so we do not show rulings from it. The court's own docket is linked on this page. Open the court's docket
