Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-OH-SC

State ex rel. Utz v. Cincinnati

No. 2026-Ohio-3805Supreme Court of Ohio

State ex rel. Utz v. Cincinnati 2025-1148Mandamus—Public-records requests—R.C. 149.43—Despite receiving requested records, relator seeks writ compelling city to provide an explanation, including legal authorit…

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

State ex rel. Utz v. Cincinnati 2025-1148Mandamus—Public-records requests—R.C. 149.43—Despite receiving requested records, relato…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
First added here
October 4, 2026
Last entry
September 30, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

State ex rel. Utz v. Cincinnati 2025-1148Mandamus—Public-records requests—R.C. 149.43—Despite receiving requested records, relator seeks writ compelling city to provide an explanation, including legal authority, for initially denying his public-records requests—Relator’s request for writ is moot because city provided requested records after relator filed complaint—City’s delay in providing statutorily compliant explanation for denying relator’s public-records requests does not by itself entitle him to statutory damages, because R.C. 149.43(B)(3) does not require that denial be prompt—Writ denied as moot—Relator’s requests for statutory damages, attorney fees, and court costs denied.Per Curi…

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

This court's public feed does not carry later entries in a case, so we do not show rulings from it. The court's own docket is linked on this page. Open the court's docket

Documents and links

Source record

Official docketSupreme Court of Ohio