The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
[Order on Motion for Discovery]
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[Order on Motion for Discovery]
- Court
- District of Columbia District
- First added here
- September 24, 2026
- Last entry
- September 23, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
2 entries, oldest first.
· District of Columbia District
Other
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 55 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and 58 Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Discovery. Please see the attached Memorandum Opinion for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/23/2026. (lcapm3)
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
· District of Columbia District · Entry 67
Other
The court's record, as written
[Order on Motion for Discovery]
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
