Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
District court · DCD

JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al

No. 1:21-cv-01887District of Columbia District

[Order on Motion for Discovery]

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

[Order on Motion for Discovery]

At a glance
Court
District of Columbia District
First added here
September 24, 2026
Last entry
September 23, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

2 entries, oldest first.

  1. · District of Columbia District

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 55 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and 58 Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Discovery. Please see the attached Memorandum Opinion for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/23/2026. (lcapm3)

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

  2. · District of Columbia District · Entry 67

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    [Order on Motion for Discovery]

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 1 such entry was left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket