The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Texas v. New Mexico
The United States' claims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.What the Court said
The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.
Official outcomeThe United States' claims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Read the published opinion ↗
- Decision date
- June 8, 2026
- Opinion author
- D
- October Term
- 2025
- Docket
- No. 141, Orig.
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
The United States' claims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- First added here
- September 13, 2026
- Last entry
- June 8, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Decision and docket history
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
The United States' claims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
The proposed final decree, Appendix A to the Fourth Interim Report of the Special Master, is entered. The Honorable D. Brooks Smith, of Duncansville, Pennsylvania, the Special Master in this case, is hereby discharged with the thanks of the Court.
Decided. The Court published no summary of the holding with this opinion. [608 U.S. 346]
Open court document ↗DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2026.
The Fourth Interim Report of the Special Master is received and ordered filed. Exceptions to the Report, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 45 days. Replies, if any, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 30 days. Sur-replies, if any, with supporting briefs, may be filed within 30 days.
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/27/2026.
The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, the Special Master in this case, is hereby discharged with the thanks of the Court. It is ordered that the Honorable D. Brooks Smith, of Duncansville, Pennsylvania, is appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and condition for proceedings, to summon witnesses, to issue subpoenas, and to take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Special Master is directed to submit reports as he may deem appropriate. The cost of printing his reports, and all other proper expenses, including travel expenses, shall be submitted to the Court.
EXCEPTION SUSTAINED. Jackson, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, Alito, and Barrett, JJ., joined.
Argued. For United States: Frederick Liu, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Texas: Lanora C. Pettit, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Austin, Tex. For New Mexico: Jeffrey J. Wechsler, Santa Fe, N. M.
Motion for divided argument filed by Texas and New Mexico GRANTED.
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 20, 2024.
The exception to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master is set for oral argument in due course.
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
Brief amicus curiae of Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority, et al. filed.
Open court document ↗Joint reply to exception of the United States by Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado filed.
Open court document ↗Brief amicus curiae of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 filed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
14 entries, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
Order extending time to file the Motion to Dismiss the Bill of Complaint filed by Texas to a date 30 days after the Court issues an order on the Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by the United States. Extension granted for all Respondents.
Outcome words in this text: granted.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
Motion for leave to intervene filed by United States GRANTED.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
Order extending time to file response to motion to intervene file by El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 granted to and including June 10, 2015, for all parties. Reply briefs are due July 10, 2015.
Outcome words in this text: granted.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
The First Interim motion of the Special Master for allowance of fees and disbursements is granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $195,461.53 for the period November 3, 2014, through April 30, 2015, to be paid as follows: 37.5% by Texas, 37.5% by New Mexico, 20% by the United States and 5% by Colorado.
Outcome words in this text: granted.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
The Second Interim Motion of the Special Master for Allowance of Fees and Disbursements, as amended by his letter dated May 20, 2016, is GRANTED, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $200,000.00, for the period May 1, 2015, through October 31, 2015, to be paid as follows: 37.5% by Texas, 37.5% by New Mexico, 20% by the United States and 5% by Colorado.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
The Third Interim Motion of the Special Master for Allowance of Fees and Disbursements, as amended by his letter dated May 17, 2017, is GRANTED, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $219,125.57, for the period November 2, 2015, through March 13, 2017, to be paid as follows: 37.5% by Texas, 37.5% by New Mexico, 20% by the United States and 5% by Colorado.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Denied
The court's record, as written
New Mexico's motion to dismiss Texas's complaint is DENIED.
Outcome words in this text: DENIED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Denied
The court's record, as written
The motion of Elephant Butte Irrigation District for leave to intervene is DENIED.
Outcome words in this text: DENIED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Denied
The court's record, as written
The motion of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 for leave to intervene is DENIED.
Outcome words in this text: DENIED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Remanded
The court's record, as written
United States's exception sustained; all other exceptions overruled; and case remanded. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Outcome words in this text: remanded.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
The final motion of the former Special Master for allowance of fees and disbursements is GRANTED, and the former Special Master is awarded a total of $10,101.86, for the period March 13, 2017, through April 2, 2018, to be paid as follows: 37.5% by Texas, 37.5% by New Mexico, 20% by the United States, and 5% by Colorado.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Denied
The court's record, as written
The Second Interim Report of the Special Master on the motion of Nathan Boyd Estate, et al. for leave to intervene is received and ordered filed. The motion of Nathan Boyd Estate, et al. for leave to intervene is denied.
Outcome words in this text: denied.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
The revised joint motion for an extension is granted. Exceptions to the Third Interim Report of the Special Master, with supporting briefs, may be filed by October 6, 2023. Replies, if any, with supporting briefs, may be filed by December 4, 2023. Sur-replies, if any, with supporting briefs, may be filed by January 3, 2024.
Outcome words in this text: granted.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Dismissed
The court's record, as written
The United States' claims in this case are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Outcome words in this text: dismissed.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 154 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
