Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative ink ripple expressing the outward consequence of a Supreme Court decision
Supreme Court · SCOTUS

Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump

No. 24-1287Supreme Court of the United States

Judgment Issued.

The clerk's words are shown exactly as filed.
Decision on file

What the Court said

The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.

Official outcome

Judgment Issued.

Read the published opinion ↗
Decision date
March 24, 2026
Opinion author
R
October Term
2025
Docket
No. 24-1287
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The activity

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The source

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

Judgment Issued.

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
First added here
August 10, 2026
Last entry
March 24, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Decision and docket history

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

Judgment in No. 24-1287 is VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; the judgment in No. 25-250 is AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II–A–1, and II–B, in which Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II–A–2 and III, in which Gorsuch and Barrett, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., and Barrett, J., filed concurring opinions. Kagan, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the

Docket entry

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 91 Stat. 1626, does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. [607 U.S. 229]

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Argued. For federal parties: D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For private parties: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C. For state parties: Benjamin N. Gutman, Solicitor General, Salem, Ore. VIDED.

Docket entry

Reply of respondents Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Trade Scholars in Economics, Politics, and Law filed (as to 25-250). (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Washington State Amici filed (as to 25-250). (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Carla Anderson Hills and Alan William Wolff filed (as to 25-250). (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Scholars of the History of Constitutional Law and the Presidency filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Emily Ley Paper, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of National Taxpayers Union Foundation filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Tax Law Professors filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Advancing American Freedom, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Peter W. Sage filed (as to 25-250). (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Princess Awesome, LLC, et al. filed (as to 25-250). (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed (as to 25-250). (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Former Government Officials, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Professors of Administrative Law, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of California, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Former Senior Military, National Security, and Foreign Policy Government Officials filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Professor Julian Arato, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of 31 Former Federal Judges filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

5 entries, oldest first.

  1. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Denied

    The court's record, as written

    Motion of petitioners to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment DENIED.

    Outcome words in this text: DENIED.

  2. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Granted

    The court's record, as written

    Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment GRANTED. The motion to expedite and the petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 25-250 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Respondents in No. 24-1287 and petitioners in No. 25-250 shall file an opening brief on the merits on or before Friday, September 19, 2025. Any amicus curiae briefs in support or in support of neither party shall be filed on or before Tuesday, September 23, 2025. Petitioners in No. 24-1287 and respondents in No. 25-250 shall file response briefs on the merits on or before Monday, October 20, 2025. Any amicus curiae briefs in support shall be filed on or before F

    Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.

  3. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Denied

    The court's record, as written

    Motion for leave to intervene filed by Susan Webber, et al. DENIED. VIDED.

    Outcome words in this text: DENIED.

  4. · Supreme Court of the United States

    VacatedAffirmedRemanded

    The court's record, as written

    Judgment in No. 24-1287 is VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; the judgment in No. 25-250 is AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II–A–1, and II–B, in which Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II–A–2 and III, in which Gorsuch and Barrett, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., and Barrett, J., filed concurring opinions. Kagan, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the

    Outcome words in this text: VACATED, REMANDED, AFFIRMED.

  5. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    Judgment Issued.

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 79 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket

Official video

Hearing, press and court recordings

AudioOral argument audio: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. (No. 24-1287)
Supreme Court of the United States · November 5, 2025
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.

Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.