Illustrative empty legislative chamber as neutral vote indicators resolve a recorded outcome

Senate Vote 334 (110th Congress, 1st Session) · September 12, 2007

H.R. 3074

On the Motion to Table

To provide a system for better construction and maintenance of America's aging bridge infrastructure by spending American tax dollars more effectively and efficiently.

ProceduralTaxes & tariffs

The question

The exact motion or nomination the chamber put to a vote.

The tally

The official yea, nay, present, and not-voting totals.

The people

Every member's recorded position linked directly to their file.

The official record

Senate.gov — official roll-call record
Congress.gov — official bill page
Tally data compiled from the official record by Voteview (UCLA) · see sources

Cite this record

Reference number: vote-110-s334
Permanent link: https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/vote-110-s334
Official source: U.S. Senate roll-call vote record ↗
Last checked: November 4, 2026Congressional vote archive last refreshed from the official roll-call records

AP style

Power & Politics, "Senate recorded vote (110th Congress): On the Motion to Table (H.R. 3074)," last checked Nov. 4, 2026, citing U.S. Senate roll-call vote record, https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/vote-110-s334

APA

Power & Politics. (2026, November 4). Senate recorded vote (110th Congress): On the Motion to Table (H.R. 3074) [Roll-call vote record]. Retrieved November 5, 2026, from https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/vote-110-s334

Chicago

Power & Politics. "Senate recorded vote (110th Congress): On the Motion to Table (H.R. 3074)." Last modified November 4, 2026. Accessed November 5, 2026. https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/vote-110-s334.

BibTeX

@misc{votefiles_vote_110_s334,
  author       = {{Power & Politics}},
  title        = {{Senate recorded vote (110th Congress): On the Motion to Table (H.R. 3074)}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/vote-110-s334}},
  note         = {Reference number vote-110-s334; official source: U.S. Senate roll-call vote record, https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll\_call\_votes/vote1101/vote\_110\_1\_00334.htm; last checked November 4, 2026; accessed November 5, 2026}
}

Plain link

https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/vote-110-s334

Cite the official source for the underlying fact. Power & Politics reference number never changes for this record. AP, APA and Chicago are standard citation styles for news and academic writing, and BibTeX is the format reference-manager programs read.

The tally

How the vote fell

The measure itself

What was on the floor

Same measure, other votes

Every roll call on H.R. 3074

The map

How each state's senators voted

In 26 states every senator on the roll voted yes; in 15 every one voted no; 9 were split. Each square is a state, placed roughly where it sits on the map. Select a state to see how each of its senators voted.

All yes
All no
Split
No yes or no vote

Alaska: 2 yes, 0 no
Maine: 2 yes, 0 no
Vermont: 2 yes, 0 no
New Hampshire: 0 yes, 2 no
Washington: 2 yes, 0 no
Idaho: 0 yes, 1 no, 1 did not vote yes or no
Montana: 2 yes, 0 no
North Dakota: 2 yes, 0 no
Minnesota: 2 yes, 0 no
Illinois: 2 yes, 0 no
Wisconsin: 2 yes, 0 no
Michigan: 2 yes, 0 no
New York: 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no
Rhode Island: 2 yes, 0 no
Massachusetts: 2 yes, 0 no
Oregon: 2 yes, 0 no
Nevada: 1 yes, 1 no
Wyoming: 0 yes, 2 no
South Dakota: 1 yes, 1 no
Iowa: 1 yes, 1 no
Indiana: 1 yes, 1 no
Ohio: 2 yes, 0 no
Pennsylvania: 2 yes, 0 no
New Jersey: 2 yes, 0 no
Connecticut: 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no
California: 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no
Utah: 0 yes, 2 no
Colorado: 1 yes, 1 no
Nebraska: 1 yes, 1 no
Missouri: 2 yes, 0 no
Kentucky: 0 yes, 2 no
West Virginia: 2 yes, 0 no
Virginia: 1 yes, 1 no
Maryland: 2 yes, 0 no
Delaware: 2 yes, 0 no
Arizona: 0 yes, 1 no, 1 did not vote yes or no
New Mexico: 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no
Kansas: 0 yes, 2 no
Arkansas: 2 yes, 0 no
Tennessee: 0 yes, 2 no
North Carolina: 0 yes, 2 no
South Carolina: 0 yes, 2 no
District of Columbia: no member on this roll call
Oklahoma: 0 yes, 2 no
Louisiana: 1 yes, 1 no
Mississippi: 0 yes, 2 no
Alabama: 0 yes, 2 no
Georgia: 0 yes, 2 no
Hawaii: 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no
Texas: 0 yes, 2 no
Florida: 1 yes, 1 no

Numbers are yes–no. Members who did not vote, voted present, or were paired are counted in each state's list below.

Official records

Every vote, by name — 101 members

Select any member to pull their file.

On the Motion to Table

How the vote fell

What was on the floor

Every roll call on H.R. 3074

How each state's senators voted

Alaska 2 yes, 0 no

Alabama 0 yes, 2 no

Arkansas 2 yes, 0 no

Arizona 0 yes, 1 no, 1 did not vote yes or no

California 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no

Colorado 1 yes, 1 no

Connecticut 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no

Delaware 2 yes, 0 no

Florida 1 yes, 1 no

Georgia 0 yes, 2 no

Hawaii 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no

Iowa 1 yes, 1 no

Idaho 0 yes, 1 no, 1 did not vote yes or no

Illinois 2 yes, 0 no

Indiana 1 yes, 1 no

Kansas 0 yes, 2 no

Kentucky 0 yes, 2 no

Louisiana 1 yes, 1 no

Massachusetts 2 yes, 0 no

Maryland 2 yes, 0 no

Maine 2 yes, 0 no

Michigan 2 yes, 0 no

Minnesota 2 yes, 0 no

Missouri 2 yes, 0 no

Mississippi 0 yes, 2 no

Montana 2 yes, 0 no

North Carolina 0 yes, 2 no

North Dakota 2 yes, 0 no

Nebraska 1 yes, 1 no

New Hampshire 0 yes, 2 no

New Jersey 2 yes, 0 no

New Mexico 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no

Nevada 1 yes, 1 no

New York 1 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote yes or no

Ohio 2 yes, 0 no

Oklahoma 0 yes, 2 no

Oregon 2 yes, 0 no

Pennsylvania 2 yes, 0 no

Rhode Island 2 yes, 0 no

South Carolina 0 yes, 2 no

South Dakota 1 yes, 1 no

Tennessee 0 yes, 2 no

Texas 0 yes, 2 no

Utah 0 yes, 2 no

Virginia 1 yes, 1 no

Vermont 2 yes, 0 no

Washington 2 yes, 0 no

Wisconsin 2 yes, 0 no

West Virginia 2 yes, 0 no

Wyoming 0 yes, 2 no

Every vote, by name — 101 members