Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Only your five-digit ZIP code is sent. We never ask for your address.
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative empty legislative chamber as neutral vote indicators resolve a recorded outcome
102nd Congress · 1991–1993
H.Res. 596

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2321) to establish the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical…

Congress House
Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. · October 4, 1992
Understand the measure

What this bill does

No official summary is on file here yet. Check Congress.gov for available summaries and the bill text.

Check official summaries ↗

01
The measure

The official bill title and text published by Congress and GovInfo.

02
The movement

Every committee, chamber, and clerk-recorded action attached to its date.

03
The votes

Every roll call on this measure, or a notice when no individual vote exists.

Where it stands

The measure's progress

Passed House

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Recorded October 4, 1992, as the clerk wrote it

Sponsor Rep. Hall, Tony P. [D-OH-3]
Committee Rules Committee
Official title Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2321) to establish the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes.
Recorded votes None taken
The official record
Cite this record
Reference number
bill-102-hres596
Official source
Congress.gov ↗
Last checked
Status and actions last read from the official GovInfo BILLSTATUS record
AP style

Power & Politics, "H.Res. 596 (102nd Congress): Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2321) to establish the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes," last checked Oct. 15, 2026, citing Congress.gov, https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/bill-102-hres596

APA

Power & Politics. (2026, October 15). H.Res. 596 (102nd Congress): Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2321) to establish the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes [Bill record]. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/bill-102-hres596

Chicago

Power & Politics. "H.Res. 596 (102nd Congress): Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2321) to establish the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes." Last modified October 15, 2026. Accessed October 27, 2026. https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/bill-102-hres596.

BibTeX
@misc{votefiles_bill_102_hres596,
  author       = {{Power & Politics}},
  title        = {{H.Res. 596 (102nd Congress): Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2321) to establish the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park in the State of Ohio, and for other purposes}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/bill-102-hres596}},
  note         = {Reference number bill-102-hres596; official source: Congress.gov, https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-resolution/596; last checked October 15, 2026; accessed October 27, 2026}
}
Plain link

https://powerandpolitics.co/cite/bill-102-hres596

Cite the official source for the underlying fact. Power & Politics reference number never changes for this record. AP, APA and Chicago are standard citation styles for news and academic writing, and BibTeX is the format reference-manager programs read.

Official analyses

CBO cost estimates and CRS reports on H.Res. 596

No official record has been found at this time. We are watching for updates.

Listed only where the Congressional Budget Office names this bill number in its estimate's title and that title matches the bill's own, or where the Congressional Research Service lists this bill among a report's related materials. Titles and dates are the publishers' own. All watchdog and scorekeeper reports

Official records

No recorded vote

No roll call has been taken on this measure, so no member's position on it is on the record. Most measures never get one.

The House agreed to this measure without a recorded vote, which is what a voice vote or unanimous consent produces. No individual position on that passage exists to show.