The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
District court · TXSD
Kinder Morgan, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor et al
No. 4:25-cv-03651Texas Southern District
[~Util - Set/Clear Flags]
The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[~Util - Set/Clear Flags]
- Court
- Texas Southern District
- First added here
- August 17, 2026
- Last entry
- October 13, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
[Transmittal of Appeal (FORM, noticing) - Civil]
Docket entry
[Electronic Record on Appeal Certified]
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Texas Southern District
GrantedDenied
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons explained, the Federal Defendants' 33 MOTION to Dismiss 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 1 Complaint, or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and Plaintiff's 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. Defendants, the United States Department of Labor, Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-Deremer, the Office of Administrative Law Judges, Administrative Law Judge John M. Herke, and James Jackson, are hereby enjoined from proceeding any further with OALJ case number 2021-PSI-000002 and any related adjudicative proceeding(s) within the Department of Labor against Kinder Morgan, Inc., including without limitation a
Outcome words in this text: Injunction, DENIED, GRANTED.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 5 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket