Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative ink ripple expressing the outward consequence of a Supreme Court decision
Supreme Court · SCOTUS

Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

No. 24-983Supreme Court of the United States

Record returned to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.
Decision on file

What the Court said

The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.

Official outcome

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED.

Read the published opinion ↗
Decision date
May 21, 2026
Opinion author
T
October Term
2025
Docket
No. 24-983
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

Record returned to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
First added here
August 10, 2026
Last entry
August 5, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Decision and docket history

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

Record returned to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Docket entry

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kavanaugh, J., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Docket entry

In action filed by the Havana Docks Corporation pursuant to Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, 22 U. S. C. §6021 et seq., related to its property interest in the operation of docks at the Port of Havana, respondent cruise lines’ use of the docks is sufficient to establish that they used “property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government;” Havana Docks is not required to establish that the cruise lines “trafficked” in Havana Dock’s property interest. [608/1]

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Argued. For petitioner: Richard D. Klingler, Washington, D. C.; and Aimee Brown, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Paul D. Clement, Alexandria, Va.

Docket entry

Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.

Docket entry

CIRCULATED

Docket entry

Record received from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and available with the Clerk (one envelope).

Docket entry

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Docket entry

Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Docket entry

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, February 23, 2026.

Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Cruise Lines International Association filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief of respondents Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., et al. filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Representative Mario Díaz-Balart, et al. filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Petition GRANTED.

Docket entry

Supplemental brief of respondents Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

3 entries, oldest first.

  1. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Granted

    The court's record, as written

    Petition GRANTED.

    Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.

  2. · Supreme Court of the United States

    VacatedRemanded

    The court's record, as written

    Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kavanaugh, J., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

    Outcome words in this text: VACATED, REMANDED.

  3. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    Judgment Issued.

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 34 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket

Official video

Hearing, press and court recordings

AudioOral argument audio: Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises (No. 24-983)
Supreme Court of the United States · February 23, 2026
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.

Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.