Skip to page content
Power & PoliticsUnited States edition
Sections
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative ink ripple expressing the outward consequence of a Supreme Court decision
Supreme Court · SCOTUS

Trump v. Slaughter

No. 25-332Supreme Court of the United States

Judgment Issued.

The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.
Decision on file

What the Court said

The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.

Official outcome

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED.

Read the published opinion ↗
Decision date
June 29, 2026
Opinion author
R
October Term
2025
Docket
No. 25-332
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

Judgment Issued.

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
First added here
August 10, 2026
Last entry
July 31, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Decision and docket history

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to all but Part III–B. Gorsuch, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kagan and Jackson, JJ., joined.

Docket entry

The Federal Trade Commission’s for-cause removal provision, 15 U. S. C. §41, is contrary to the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. [609/2]

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Argued. For petitioners: D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Amit Agarwal, Washington, D. C.

Docket entry

Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of National Whistleblower Center filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Former Members of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Patrick J. Borchers, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Former Senior White House Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of 207 Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of The American Antitrust Institute, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Professor Nicholas R. Bednar, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Thirteen Retired Federal Judges filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Independent Agency Board Members, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Campaign Legal Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Legal Historian Noah A. Rosenblum, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman filed. (Distributed)

Open court document ↗

Rulings in this case over time

Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.

5 entries, oldest first.

  1. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Stayed

    The court's record, as written

    Order entered by The Chief Justice: Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, it is ordered that the July 17, 2025 order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 1:25-cv-909, is hereby stayed pending further order of The Chief Justice or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Monday, September 15th, 2025, by 4 p.m. (EDT).

    Outcome words in this text: stayed.

  2. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Granted

    The court's record, as written

    Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment GRANTED. (Detached Opinion)

    Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.

  3. · Supreme Court of the United States

    StayedGranted

    The court's record, as written

    Application (25A264) for stay presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted. The July 17, 2025 order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 25–cv–909, ECF Doc. 52, is stayed. The application is also treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment, and the petition is granted (case No. 25-332). The parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: (1) Whether the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers and, if so, whether Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U. S. 602 (1935), should be overruled. (2) Whether a federal court may preve

    Outcome words in this text: granted, stayed.

  4. · Supreme Court of the United States

    ReversedRemanded

    The court's record, as written

    Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to all but Part III–B. Gorsuch, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kagan and Jackson, JJ., joined.

    Outcome words in this text: REVERSED, REMANDED.

  5. · Supreme Court of the United States

    Other

    The court's record, as written

    Judgment Issued.

    This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.

Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 76 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket

On the Constitution page

This case is listed in the Disputes record under the clause it concerns.

Official video

Hearing, press and court recordings

AudioOral argument audio: Trump, President of United States v. Slaughter (No. 25-332)
Supreme Court of the United States · December 8, 2025
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.

Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.