The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
District court · TXED
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
No. 6:22-cv-00450Texas Eastern District
[USCA Mandate]
The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[USCA Mandate]
- Court
- Texas Eastern District
- First added here
- August 12, 2026
- Last entry
- October 2, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· Texas Eastern District
GrantedDenied
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment 25, 26, DENYING IN PART Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment 41. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 8/24/2023. (esw)
Outcome words in this text: GRANTING, DENYING.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 2 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket