The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Court of appeals · CA11
BNSF Railway Company v. Federal Railroad Administration, et al
No. 24-12003Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
[Opinion Issued]
The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[Opinion Issued]
- Court
- Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
- First added here
- August 11, 2026
- Last entry
- August 11, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
2 entries, oldest first.
· Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
AffirmedDenied
The court's record, as written
Opinion issued by court as to Petitioner Florida East Coast Railway LLC in 24-11076, Petitioner Texas & Northern Railway Company in 24-11300, Petitioner Association of American Railroads in 24-11366, Petitioner American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association in 24-11367, Petitioner Indiana Rail Road Company in 24-11428, Petitioner Union Pacific Railroad Co. in 24-11444, Petitioner Nebraska Central Railroad Company in 24-11445, Petitioner BNSF Railway Company in 24-12003. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Published. Opinion method: Signed. Petition DENIED. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link <a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/
Outcome words in this text: Affirmed, DENIED.
· Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · Entry 68
Other
The court's record, as written
[Opinion Issued]
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links