The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
District court · DCD
MID-ATLANTIC INNOCENCE PROJECT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
No. 1:23-cv-02112District of Columbia District
[USCA Case Number]
The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
[USCA Case Number]
- Court
- District of Columbia District
- First added here
- September 18, 2026
- Last entry
- September 30, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
[USCA Case Number]
Docket entry
[USCA Case Number]
Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
1 entry, oldest first.
· District of Columbia District
Other
The court's record, as written
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding defendants' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; and plaintiff's 27 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on March 19, 2026. (lcbah4)
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 6 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket