The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Supreme Court · SCOTUS
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
No. 24-783Supreme Court of the United States
Judgment Issued.
The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.Decision on file
What the Court said
The wording below comes from the Court's published decision or opinion—not our own summary.
Official outcomeAdjudged to be AFFIRMED.
Read the published opinion ↗
- Decision date
- April 22, 2026
- Opinion author
- SS
- October Term
- 2025
- Docket
- No. 24-783
The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Judgment Issued.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- First added here
- August 10, 2026
- Last entry
- May 26, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Decision and docket history
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Docket entry
Because 28 U. S. C. §1446(b)(1)’s text, structure, and context are inconsistent with equitable tolling, Enbridge’s removal of the case to federal court outside the statute’s 30-day deadline was untimely. [608 U.S. 67]
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Argued. For petitioners: John J. Bursch, Caledonia, Mich. For respondent: Ann M. Sherman, Solicitor General, Lansing, Mich.
Docket entry
CIRCULATED
Docket entry
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
Docket entry
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Docket entry
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, February 24, 2026.
Docket entry
Reply of petitioners Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, et al. filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief amici curiae of Federal Courts and Civil Procedure Scholars filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief of respondent Dana Nessel, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the People of the State of Michigan filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief amici curiae of North America's Building Trades Unions, et al. filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Brief of petitioners Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, et al. filed.
Open court document ↗Docket entry
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 29, 2025. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 14, 2025.
Docket entry
Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
Open court document ↗Rulings in this case over time
Courts at different levels and stages can reach different results in the same case. Each entry is the court's own record; read it before drawing a conclusion.
3 entries, oldest first.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Granted
The court's record, as written
Petition GRANTED.
Outcome words in this text: GRANTED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Affirmed
The court's record, as written
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Outcome words in this text: AFFIRMED.
· Supreme Court of the United States
Other
The court's record, as written
Judgment Issued.
This text does not state an outcome in words we recognize. It is shown as written.
Method: an entry is marked with an outcome only when its own text contains the outcome word, and the word is shown beside it. Orders, opinions and judgments whose text does not say are marked Other. Party filings, notices and routine procedural orders (appearances, extra pages, time extensions, scheduling) are not listed; 43 such entries were left out of this case. No link between this case and any other case is recorded in our data, so only this case's own record is shown. Open the court's docket
Documents and links
Source record
Official video
Hearing, press and court recordings
AudioOral argument audio: Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (No. 24-783)
Supreme Court of the United States · February 24, 2026
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.
Supreme Court of the United States · February 24, 2026
License: Audio is linked from supremecourt.gov and is not copied or rehosted.
Attached only where an official listing names this record's exact number or title. Nothing loads from YouTube until you choose "Load player"; the video is never copied to Power & Politics.